Relatives' Heartache Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.
Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.